Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Citation
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2003-02-20
Other Sections in This Document (25)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
- Porter Novelli, Inc. v. Bender, 817 A.2d 185 (2003)
Full Text
1,058 charsIn this second appeal subtenant, in support of the landlord-tenant court ruling, argues that landlord not only is bound by the law of the case — which landlord itself helped establish — but also cannot claim prejudice from receipt of the double rent due under a lease that landlord had signed and accepted. Landlord, on the other hand, notes that the law of the case was twofold, embracing landlord’s right to both immediate possession and double rent during holdover; that subtenant trumped that dual right by obtaining a stay in this court premised on landlord’s entitlement to triple rent under an agreement forestalling possession; that landlord otherwise could have taken over the premises as it desired (and the judge had ordered) well before May 8, 2000; and thus that subtenant, having received the benefit of a stay the landlord-tenant court itself rejected, is es-topped to deny landlord’s right to triple rent as the price for its representation to this court that led to the stay of eviction *188 until subtenant was ready to vacate the premises.