Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Citation
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Parent Document
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2002-11-27
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
- Killingham v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission, 810 A.2d 925 (2002)
Full Text
452 chars. The parties do not dispute — and the attorney examiner found — that the circumstances in this case gave rise to a presumption of retaliatory action by the housing provider. See D.C.Code § 42-3505.02(b). The burden thereupon shifted to the housing provider to "come[] forward with clear and convincing evidence to rebut this presumption,” failing which the examiner would have been re*927quired to ("shall”) "enter judgment in the tenant’s favor.” Id.