Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 42-3505

Citation
§ 42-3505
Parent Document
Holmes, Jr. v. DC Department of Housing & Community Development and 1516 & 1520 Holobrook Street NE Tenants Association, Inc. (2020)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2020-07-09

Other Sections in This Document (255)

Full Text

1,005 chars
4
          In support of his standing argument, Mr. Holmes relies in part on the
judicial review provision of the District of Columbia Administrative Procedures
Act (DCAPA). See D.C. Code § 2-510(a) (2016 Repl.) (authorizing “[a]ny person
suffering a legal wrong, or adversely affected or aggrieved, by an order or decision
of the Mayor or an agency in a contested case” to seek judicial review in this
court). We do not understand him to argue that the statute provides him broader
standing than our case law. Moreover, because we conclude that he cannot
establish standing under our case law as an injured individual, see infra, we need
not address the tenant association’s argument that the judicial review provision in
D.C. Code § 42-3405.09 (authorizing “any party” to an administrative proceeding
under the Rental Conversion and Sale Act to seek judicial review under the
DCAPA in this court) imposes a heightened standing requirement on Mr. Holmes.
                                             11