Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Scarborough v. Winn Residential L.L.P., 890 A.2d 249 (2006)

Citation
Scarborough v. Winn Residential L.L.P., 890 A.2d 249 (2006)
Parent Document
Scarborough v. Winn Residential L.L.P., 890 A.2d 249 (2006)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2006-01-12

Other Sections in This Document (93)

Full Text

799 chars
. Scarborough renews that argument on appeal, but we reject it. The notice met both District of Columbia and federal requirements for notice. It contained "a statement detailing the reasons for the eviction,” D.C.Code § 42-3505.01(a), including "the factual basis on which the housing provider relie[d].” 14 DCMR § 4302.1(a) (2005). It likewise "specified] the grounds for [termination].” 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(d)(l)(B)(iv). Although the notice did not expressly reference paragraph 23 of appellant's lease, it did inform her that the termination was for lease violations, and a cursory review of the lease would have led her to paragraph 23, the only one dealing with termination of the tenancy. Further, while it did not cite to specific criminal statutes alleged to be violated, the reference to *253