Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Wahl v. Watkis, 491 A.2d 477 (1985)

Citation
Wahl v. Watkis, 491 A.2d 477 (1985)
Parent Document
Wahl v. Watkis, 491 A.2d 477 (1985)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1985-01-09

Full Text

630 chars
note 1, and thus, on the record before us, we conclude the presumption of retaliatory action by appellee did not arise. Further, the tenant’s contention that the landlord did not intend to take immediate possession is a bare assertion which appellee disputed and is unsupported in this court. The tenant did not file a motion in the trial court for reconsideration of the judgment, and issues generally may not be raised for the first time on appeal. Gillespie v. Washington, 395 A.2d 18, 21 (D.C.1978). We find no merit to appellant’s other contentions. 4 Accordingly the judgment is affirmed. 1 . D.C.Code § 45-1561(d) provides: