Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

BORGER MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Nelson-Lee, 959 A.2d 694 (2008)

Citation
BORGER MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Nelson-Lee, 959 A.2d 694 (2008)
Parent Document
BORGER MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Nelson-Lee, 959 A.2d 694 (2008)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
2008-10-30

Other Sections in This Document (30)

Full Text

631 chars
After Nelson-Lee refused to vacate her apartment, Borger filed a complaint for possession. At a hearing, the trial court dismissed the complaint, concluding that the November 28, 2006 notice to quit was defective because it did not provide Nelson-Lee with an opportunity to cure. The ruling was premised on Borger’s concession that Nelson-Lee had in fact corrected the violation during the thirty-day cure period. On appeal, Borger contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the Act required the company to provide the tenant with an opportunity to cure, when it had previously done so six months earlier. Amicus curiae