Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Joyner v. Jonathan Woodner Co., 479 A.2d 308 (1984)

Citation
Joyner v. Jonathan Woodner Co., 479 A.2d 308 (1984)
Parent Document
Joyner v. Jonathan Woodner Co., 479 A.2d 308 (1984)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1984-07-06

Other Sections in This Document (46)

Full Text

554 chars
Nor are we persuaded that denial of the motion resulted in an unfair proceeding. Rather, a review of the record indicates that appellants’ counsel understood the case and vigorously advanced appellants’ position. There is no indication that denial of the motion resulted in any witnesses being unable to appear or the loss of any evidence in support of appellants’ ease. We recognize that the significant interest in keeping the trial court’s calendar current must not infringe on the parties’ rights to a fair hearing. See Harris v. Akindulureni, supra.