Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Citation
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- Kentucky (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-10-20
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 778 S.W.2d 657 (1989)
- § 8
- § 8
- § 8
- § 8
- § 8
Full Text
487 charsThe appellant argues that summary judgment was improvidently granted because there was a material issue of fact as to whether he was given notice of the sale of the vehicle as well as a question of fact concerning whether the sale was conducted in a commercially reasonable manner. Certainly, if either of these issues were relevant to Ford Credit’s entitlement to judgment, the case would have to be reversed. See McCoy v. American Fidelity Bank & Trust Co., Ky., 715 S.W.2d 228 (1986).