McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- Citation
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- Parent Document
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- Jurisdiction
- Kentucky (state)
- Effective Date
- 1925-06-05
Other Sections in This Document (17)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
- McKnight v. Broadway & Fourth Avenue Realty Co., 273 S.W. 32 (1925)
Full Text
684 charsThis was on May 2, 1924, and there then remained to appellee less than four months of the twelve months in which it had to restore the buildings to their former state, if the terms of the lease rather than the agreement with three of appellants were to control. A temporary restraining order was granted, but at the expiration of the twelve months in which, according to the lease, appellee had to restore the building to its former state, appellants filed an action at law seeking a forfeiture of the $50,000.00 of securities in the hands of the trustee. The chancellor required them to set up' that claim in this action, which they did by an answer, counterclaim and cross-petition.