Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bennett v. Horton, 592 S.W.2d 460 (1979)

Citation
Bennett v. Horton, 592 S.W.2d 460 (1979)
Parent Document
Bennett v. Horton, 592 S.W.2d 460 (1979)
Jurisdiction
Kentucky (state)
Effective Date
1979-12-18

Full Text

356 chars
is that they did not plead “substantial performance.” They pleaded that they had made substantial improvements to the real estate, not that there was substantial performance of the contract. There is a great difference between the two. Nevertheless, not even partial performance will take the case from the statute of frauds. Head v. Schwartz’ Ex’r, supra.