Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Clay v. Terrill, 670 S.W.2d 492 (1984)

Citation
Clay v. Terrill, 670 S.W.2d 492 (1984)
Parent Document
Clay v. Terrill, 670 S.W.2d 492 (1984)
Jurisdiction
Kentucky (state)
Effective Date
1984-06-01

Full Text

325 chars
Therefore, whether KRS 383.140 was repealed or not is no longer an issue, as the new Act, including the repealer section, is unconstitutional. An unconstitutional act is not an immunity; nor can it operate to supersede any existing valid law. Chicago, I & L.R. Co. v. Hackett, 228 U.S. 559, 33 S.Ct. 581, 57 L.Ed. 966 (1913).