Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Western Plaza, LLC v. Tison, 180 Wash. App. 17 (2014)

Citation
Western Plaza, LLC v. Tison, 180 Wash. App. 17 (2014)
Parent Document
Western Plaza, LLC v. Tison, 180 Wash. App. 17 (2014)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2014-01-28

Other Sections in This Document (28)

Full Text

735 chars
¶16 Further, Western Plaza agreed at oral argument that the original landlord, Erlitz, was bound to the Agreement’s rent increase limitation, and it also conceded that Western Plaza bought the mobile home park subject to all the leases that were in place at the time of the purchase. Wash. Court of Appeals oral argument, W. Plaza v. Tison, No. 43514-4-II (Oct. 14,2013), at 19 min., 30 sec. through 20 min., 30 sec. (on file with court). Therefore, Western Plaza took Tison’s lease subject to the Agreement’s specific provision providing for future rent increase limitations. We cannot ignore that provision, as Western Plaza seeks to do. And because it does not violate the MHLTA, we must enforce it. See Torgerson, 166 Wn.2d at 517.