Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Citation
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-08-14
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
- Sunrise Group Homes, Inc. v. Ferguson, 777 P.2d 553 (1989)
Full Text
290 charsAppellant argues that the RLTA focuses on whether the provision of room and board is incidental to some other service or activity, and then stresses that Bernice's room and board at Olivia Park are not incidental but are the very reason she lives there. Appellant misconstrues the word *289