Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Western Plaza, LLC v. Tison, 184 Wash. 2d 702 (2015)

Citation
Western Plaza, LLC v. Tison, 184 Wash. 2d 702 (2015)
Parent Document
Western Plaza, LLC v. Tison, 184 Wash. 2d 702 (2015)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2015-11-25

Other Sections in This Document (78)

Full Text

583 chars
¶5 Tison moved for summary judgment, arguing that Western Plaza was bound by the rent cap provision. Western Plaza argued that the rent cap provision was not enforceable because it conflicted with the MHLTA and violated the statute of frauds. The trial court denied Tison’s *707motion for summary judgment and resolved the unlawful detainer action in Western Plaza’s favor. The Court of Appeals reversed. W. Plaza, LLC v. Tison, 180 Wn. App. 17, 322 P.3d 1, review granted, 181 Wn.2d 1022, 336 P.3d 1165 (2014). We granted Western Plaza’s petition for review and now affirm. ANALYSIS