The burden is upon the process server and not upon the 13 year old to show that they are of suitable age and discretion. The facts and arguments presented cannot support a finding that the 13 year old was of suitable age and discretion and as such the traverse is sustained.
As the traverse is sustained, the default final judgment of possession must be vacated. Absent a final judgment of possession, there cannot be a warrant of eviction and the warrant is vacated, although it had been executed.
Accordingly, the post-eviction order to show cause is granted, and respondents are restored to possession forthwith, and the case is dismissed without prejudice.