Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Citation
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Parent Document
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 1999-03-15
Other Sections in This Document (28)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
- Housing Authority v. Silva, 972 P.2d 952 (1999)
Full Text
566 charsAfter Silva failed to vacate within the time period provided by the termination notice, the SHA commenced unlawful detainer proceedings. At a show cause hearing, Silva argued that the SHA had not complied with state and local notice requirements and had unlawfully discriminated against him by refusing to reasonably accommodate his disability. The court commissioner rejected Silva’s arguments and issued a writ restoring possession to the SHA, which was stayed pending Silva’s motion to revise. On revision, the Superior Court upheld the commissioner’s ruling *734