Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Housing Resource Group v. Price, 958 P.2d 327 (1998)

Citation
Housing Resource Group v. Price, 958 P.2d 327 (1998)
Parent Document
Housing Resource Group v. Price, 958 P.2d 327 (1998)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
1998-06-23

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Full Text

515 chars
Price's primary argument on appeal is that HRG failed to comply with federal regulations governing federally subsidized housing leases. He argues that the new lease was invalid because HRG did not provide a written notice at least 60 days before the beginning date of the new lease as required by the regulations. He argues, therefore, that the prior lease continued in effect, with a rent contribution of $127 a month. To support his position, he cites 24 C.F.R. § 982.309(e)(2): (e) New lease or revision. . . . .