Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Citation
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Parent Document
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 1998-03-23
Other Sections in This Document (20)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
- Sullivan v. Purvis, 966 P.2d 912 (1998)
Full Text
375 charsThe prior communications argued by Sullivan are not part of the record. But it is irrelevant how often or forcefully Purvis was informally notified of alleged breaches of his lease. The landlord elected to proceed under RCW 59.12, but failed to perform the jurisdictional requirement of strict compliance. *915 The court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Its order is void.