Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

1930 Llc, V. Terry Jackson, 565 P.3d 572 (2025)

Citation
1930 Llc, V. Terry Jackson, 565 P.3d 572 (2025)
Parent Document
1930 Llc, V. Terry Jackson, 565 P.3d 572 (2025)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2025-03-11

Other Sections in This Document (118)

Full Text

666 chars
Leda, 150 Wn. App. at 83 (emphasis in original) (footnote omitted).
4
  1930 argues that the Jacksons “should have filed a motion for reconsideration or motion to vacate
the judgment” prior to appealing. See Br. of Resp’t at 12. 1930 does not cite to any authority
precluding the Jacksons from pursuing an appeal before filing such motions. Therefore, we do not
consider their argument. See DeHeer v. Seattle Post-Intelligence, 60 Wn.2d 122, 126, 373 P.2d
193 (1962) (“Where no authorities are cited in support of a proposition, [courts are] not required
to search out authorities, but may assume that counsel, after diligent search, has found none.”). 7
58674-6-II