Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 241 P.3d 1256 (2010)

Citation
Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 241 P.3d 1256 (2010)
Parent Document
Eastwood v. Horse Harbor Foundation, Inc., 241 P.3d 1256 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2010-11-04

Other Sections in This Document (102)

Full Text

515 chars
[5] The seller disclosed that a few years before the pipe between the house and the septic tank had been replaced. Alejandre, 159 Wash.2d at 679, 153 P.3d 864. The buyer had the septic tank pumped and inspected; the inspector stated that the "back baffle could not be inspected but there was `[n]o obvious malfunction of the system at the time of work done.'" Id. (citing record) (alterations in Alejandre). Had the back baffle been inspected, the defect likely would have been discovered. Id. at 690, 153 P.3d 864.