Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Olson v. Scholes, 563 P.2d 1275 (1977)

Citation
Olson v. Scholes, 563 P.2d 1275 (1977)
Parent Document
Olson v. Scholes, 563 P.2d 1275 (1977)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
1977-04-25

Other Sections in This Document (83)

Full Text

732 chars
The lessees, as appellants, have set out as assignments of error the trial court's entry of findings of fact Nos. 7 through 15, the trial court's conclusions of law, and the failure of the trial court to enter 23 proposed findings and conclusions. A broadcast condemnation of each finding and conclusion such as this is of no assistance to an appellate court in ascertaining the contentions raised on appeal. This appeal was pending prior to the effective date of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Court of Appeals Rules on Appeal apply. Under CAROA 43, each error of the trial court was to be "definitely pointed out in the 'assignments of error' . . ."As stated in Knatvold v. Rydman, 28 Wn.2d 178, 183, 182 P.2d 9 (1947):