Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Citation
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Parent Document
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 1994-09-29
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1451149/frobig-v-gordon/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (57)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
Full Text
486 charscommercial. We are concerned here only with Frobig’s action against the Branches alleging negligence and strict liability. The trial court dismissed this action finding that, as landlords, the Branches had no liability. Frobig appealed and the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for trial. In its decision, the court distinguished between the liability of a landlord for dog attacks on rented or leased premises and the liability for a tiger attack. See Fro-big, at 576-77. Analysis