Sjogren v. Properties of Pacific Northwest, L.L.C., 118 Wash. App. 144 (2003)

Citation: Sjogren v. Properties of Pacific Northwest, L.L.C., 118 Wash. App. 144 (2003)
Parent Document: Sjogren v. Properties of Pacific Northwest, L.L.C., 118 Wash. App. 144 (2003)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2003-08-26
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4935955/sjogren-v-properties-of-pacific... ↗

Full Text

689 chars

We review a summary judgment de novo. Mains Farm Homeowners Ass’n v. Worthington, 121 Wn.2d 810, 813, 854 P.2d 1072 (1993). We consider all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Mason v. Kenyon Zero Storage, 71 Wn. App. 5, 8-9, 856 P.2d 410 (1993). Absent a genuine issue as to any material fact, the moving party is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Condor Enters., Inc. v. Boise Cascade Corp., 71 Wn. App. 48, 54, 856 P.2d 713 (1993) (quoting CR 56(c)). Summary judgment is proper “only if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion from all of the evidence.” Hansen v. Friend, 118 Wn.2d 476, 485, 824 P.2d 483 (1992).

Other Sections in This Document (22)

Full Text