Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Citation
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-02-11
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2621454/lian-v-stalick/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
- Lian v. Stalick, 62 P.3d 933 (2003)
Full Text
553 charsThe notice requirement set forth in comment (c) has been followed by the courts in other jurisdictions. See Payne v. Candelora, 45 Conn.Supp. 191, 194, 706 A.2d 22 (1997); Spence v. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank, 195 Ga.App. 294, 295-96, 393 S.E.2d 1 (1990). In Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. Brunson, 335 Md. 661, 671-72, 645 A.2d 1147 (1994), the court, finding a private cause of action under *937 RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF PROPERTY § 17.6, required a showing that the landlord knew, or had reason to know of the problem, and had the opportunity to correct it.