Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Lea v. Pieper, 345 N.W.2d 267 (1984)

Citation
Lea v. Pieper, 345 N.W.2d 267 (1984)
Parent Document
Lea v. Pieper, 345 N.W.2d 267 (1984)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1984-03-14

Other Sections in This Document (43)

Full Text

693 chars
A rule requiring more than one occupant of a mobile home to have an ownership interest in that home is presumed unreasonable under Minn.Stat. § 327C.05, subd. 2(d) (1982), and the rule is invalid unless shown to be reasonable by clear and convincing evidence as required by that section. Ken Lea and Dan Lieber were living in the home on June 16, 1983, the date the notice to evict was written. Ken Lea had an ownership interest transferred to him on June 3, 1983. He was an owner on the date the notice was written. This is contradictory to the trial court’s finding number 12 that the transfer to Ken Lea was made after receipt of the notice and was done to circumvent the park’s rules. *272