Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Powell, 352 N.W.2d 532 (1984)

Citation
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Powell, 352 N.W.2d 532 (1984)
Parent Document
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Powell, 352 N.W.2d 532 (1984)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1984-08-07

Other Sections in This Document (29)

Full Text

621 chars
We find that the non-waiver provision is applicable in this case. The second paragraph of the non-waiver clause refers to this situation: “The tenant continues to occupy the dwelling unit after the termination of the lease.” Further, even if the non-waiver provision were inapplicable and Powell could take advantage of it, the landlord’s conduct after the notice of termination of tenancy has been given must manifest some intent to waive the notice. The MCDA manifested no such intent here. The acceptance of rent alone does not necessarily manifest any intent to waive the notice of termination. See Arcade Investment,