aith regarding the buyout price requested by the Respondent. It was incumbent on the Petitioner's Counsels to be forthright with the negotiation.
The Court further finds that the warrant of eviction was not properly served pursuant to RPAPL §735.
All stays remain in full force and effect pending a final determination of this motion for further stay and extension of time. The motion is set down for a hearing pursuant to 50 U.S.C. App §511 and 50 U.S.C App §522.
Dated: September 22, 2004_________________________________
Pam Jackman-Brown, JHC
Copies to both sides: September 28, 2004
Attorney for Petitioner:
Eschen & Frenkel, LLP
[*6]
BY: Joseph Battista, Esq.
93 East main Street
Bay Shore, NY 11706
631-666-7775
Attorney for Respondent:
Queens Legal Services
BY: Bruno Bianchi, Esq.
89-00 Sutphin Blvd
Jamaica, NY 11435
718-657-8622