Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Citation
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Parent Document
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-04-18
Other Sections in This Document (31)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
- Eden Park Apartments v. Weston, 529 N.W.2d 732 (1995)
Full Text
538 chars(Emphasis in original.) Because the condition of the apartment had not improved by the second inspection ten days later, respondent began an unlawful detainer action. Appellant moved to have the action dismissed on the grounds that she had not received the notice specified by 42 U.S.C.A. § 1437f(d)(l)(B)(iv). The referee found that the lease had been breached, ordered restitution of the apartment, and, after, hearing separate oral arguments on the motion to dismiss, denied it. The trial court affirmed the referee’s decisions. ISSUES