AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- Citation
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- Parent Document
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2001-07-24
Other Sections in This Document (20)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
Full Text
422 charsIn June 2000, the court dismissed without prejudice the counterclaims because it found that the claims exceeded the scope of summary eviction proceedings. In January 2001, on the date set for trial, the court entered summary judgment on its own motion in favor of respondent, but later granted appellants’ motion to stay the writ of restitution. ISSUE Did the district court err in dismissing the counterclaims? 1 ANALYSIS