Juan Cuate v. Pedro Cuate-Dominguez (2024)

Citation: Juan Cuate v. Pedro Cuate-Dominguez (2024)
Parent Document: Juan Cuate v. Pedro Cuate-Dominguez (2024)
Jurisdiction: Minnesota (state)
Effective Date: 2024-09-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10129059/juan-cuate-v-pedro-cuate-dominguez/ ↗

Full Text

1,065 chars

4
  Although we recognize that the district court did not explicitly find that the “interval
between the time the rent [was] due” for purposes of Minnesota Statutes section 504B.135
was one month, that finding was implicit in the district court’s determination that
respondent had provided appellants “sufficient notice to vacate by the end of the day on
October 31, 2023[,]” by mailing the notice on September 26, 2023, which appellants
received on September 29, 2023. See White Earth Hous. Auth. v. Schwabe, 375 N.W.2d
568, 570 (Minn. App. 1985) (recognizing an implicit finding that a housing authority’s
unlawful detainer action did not constitute a retaliatory eviction in a district court’s
determination that a tenant had violated the terms of her lease (citing Parkin v. Fitzgerald,
240 N.W.2d 828 (Minn. 1976))). We also note that appellants do not challenge as clearly
erroneous any of the district court’s findings about when respondent mailed the notice,
when they received it, and the date on which respondent sought termination of the tenancy
at will.

Other Sections in This Document (231)

Full Text