Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 60448-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
1,754 charsScott’s declaration also stated that he never received any of the notices from Mason County Public Health and Human Services or the Jorgensens’ attorney about the Jorgensens’ complaints. He stated that he never had a P.O. Box address and that he never received the notices while he was in jail. B. DECLARATION FROM FAY JACKSON Jackson submitted two declarations in support of the unlawful detainer action that largely corroborated Scott’s declaration. She explained that due to Scott’s problems with drugs, she helped him keep track of his properties and affairs and was familiar with the Tralee property and the Jorgensens. Jackson denied being told of the Jorgensens’ septic problems and stated that neither she nor Scott had ever received contact from Mason County’s public health department and that Scott did not use the P.O. Box listed on the notices. Jackson also corroborated Scott’s reasons for why he was unable to reside at any of his other properties in Shelton. C. DECLARATION FROM MIKE FESENBEK The Egberts also submitted a declaration from Mike Fesenbek, a septic operator not affiliated with AAA Septic, who inspected the Tralee property’s septic system in July 2024 after the start of the eviction proceedings. Fesenbek’s declaration stated that when he inspected the Tralee property, “[e]verything about the septic system was working and functioning well.” CP at 10 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 60448-5-II 272. Based on Fesenbek’s inspection, “[t]here was no sewage leaking or pumping issues,” and “[t]here were no signs of any previous septic sewage overflows.” CP at 272. Fesenbek also declared that although during the inspection the Jorgensens had told him