Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

University Community Properties, Inc. v. Norton, 246 N.W.2d 858 (1976)

Citation
University Community Properties, Inc. v. Norton, 246 N.W.2d 858 (1976)
Parent Document
University Community Properties, Inc. v. Norton, 246 N.W.2d 858 (1976)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1976-10-29

Other Sections in This Document (45)

Full Text

653 chars
18 Cleveland-Marshall L. Rev. 358. In the instant case, for example, the trial court had earlier upheld the validity of the September Agreement between the WBTU and UCPI, and the court recognized that members of the tenants’ union were third-party beneficiaries of that agreement. However, a landlord has no duty to bargain with a; tenants’ union, and tenants do not have a statutory right to a collective bargaining relationship with the landlord. Defendants’ argument that UCPI’s breach of an agreement regarding grievance procedure vitiates the collective bargaining process, therefore, is unpersuasive. After an agreement has been reached with a *26