Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Citation
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Parent Document
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 1984-06-19
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2171258/meyer-v-parkin/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (40)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
- Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (1984)
Full Text
625 charsAs the legislative history strongly indicates, the section was intended to codify principles that had been first developed in appellate decisions of other jurisdictions and had then come to receive increasing acceptance in the courts of the state.... This developing body of law reflected judicial distress at the palpable unfairness, as applied to contemporary conditions, of older principles of landlord and tenant law that effectively separated the right of the landlord to receive rent from his obligation to maintain the apartments decently in accordance with the requirements of law. Curry, at 535, 430 N.Y.S.2d at 307.