Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Wise v. Stonebridge Cmtys., LLC, 927 N.W.2d 772 (2019)

Citation
Wise v. Stonebridge Cmtys., LLC, 927 N.W.2d 772 (2019)
Parent Document
Wise v. Stonebridge Cmtys., LLC, 927 N.W.2d 772 (2019)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2019-04-29

Other Sections in This Document (34)

Full Text

453 chars
The Wises argue that the district court erred in applying the open-and-obvious exception to Stonebridge's duty to warn of *778dangerous conditions because the uneven sidewalk was not visible to Wise. While the Wises' argument about the open-and-obvious exception fails based solely on Wise's testimony, we conclude that the district court erred by failing to resolve any doubts or factual inconsistencies in favor of the Wises, as the nonmoving parties.