Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Citation
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Parent Document
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-01-31
Other Sections in This Document (23)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
- Northgate Hous. Ltd. v. Massie (2005)
Full Text
508 charsTenants assert that the legal fees provision of the lease is prohibited by HUD rules. Tenants cite to a HUD handbook for this proposition. Tenants have not shown, however, the legal foundation—whether in federal law or regulation or elsewhere—for the handbook’s prohibition. Furthermore, tenants have not shown the applicability of HUD rules to the lease at issue. To the contrary, landlord’s attorney has suggested that tenants were not HUD subsidized residents and therefore not subject to HUD regulations.