Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Citation
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Parent Document
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-03-06
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
- Execusuite v. Cable (2025)
Full Text
547 charsAs such, plaintiff has failed to show a genuine issue for trial on the claim that defendants violated plaintiffs constitutional rights by (1) allowing Mr. McFadden to continue using the apartment, (2) telling the new tenant that someone else was still in possession of the apartment, and (3) telling plaintiff that it would be wrong to continue advertising the apartment as available for rent during the month of July 2020. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Motion 1), filed June 28, 2024, is granted. A separate judgment order shall issue.