Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Citation
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Parent Document
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-02-18
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10334687/mack-v-morel/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (35)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
- Mack v. Morel (2025)
Full Text
527 charsIn addition, the record shows that there was no action by Callahan to indicate an intent on her part to renew or continue the guarantor term or to create a constructive obligation that might create equitable estoppel based on any reliance or receipt of benefits in an implied renewal. See In re Griffin, 2006 VT 75, ¶ 18 (noting that a party intending their conduct to be acted upon by another who is ignorant of the true facts, where the other acts in reliance on this to their detriment, may give rise to equitable estoppel).