State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- Citation
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- Parent Document
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2014-05-09
Other Sections in This Document (105)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
- State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
Full Text
1,781 chars¶ 18. This case similarly presents a compelling example of that need. The first page of the plea agreement states in summary terms the six additional probation conditions defendant will agree to for the three offenses covered by that page. The second page, which is separately signed by defendant, the prosecutor, and the judge, covers three additional offenses but contains no special probation conditions for those offenses. On the backs of both pages is a list of the standard conditions that will be imposed by the court. Not all the standard conditions ultimately included in the court order are stated on this back side. At the change-of-plea hearing the prosecutor described the six additional probation terms to be imposed as “the probation conditions” and never mentioned the standard probation conditions. The only statement from the judge was: “And the other conditions we’ve described here all apply,” even though the judge had described no probation conditions. We recognize that the probation condition for which there is the strongest claim that defendant had actual notice is the one at issue, at least as to the three offenses covered by it. The statement of this condition in the plea agreement is the same as in the probation order. If the violation were based on one of the standard conditions, the State would have to argue actual notice based on the boilerplate terms on the back of the plea agreement—that defendant probably never saw—and in the face of the prosecutor’s statement that the probation conditions were the six special conditions, without mentioning the standard conditions. If the violation were based on a condition added by the court, with no notice to the defendant, this case would be even clearer.