Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 52222-5-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
999 chars5 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 52222-5-II III. REVISION HEARING Guy and Mattler filed a motion to revise the commissioner’s decision with the superior court. At the time of the revision hearing, Guy and Mattler had voluntarily moved out of the house on August 1, 2018. The superior court denied the motion for revision and issued a written order adopting the commissioner’s findings, conclusions, and decision granting the writ and concluding that Tedford did not retaliate. The superior court then awarded additional attorney fees and costs for Tedford and entered a supplemental judgment in the amount of $1,000. Guy and Mattler appeal. ANALYSIS2 I. LEGAL PRINCIPLES Show cause hearings are summary proceedings to determine the issue of possession pending a lawsuit. Carlstrom v. Hanline, 98 Wn. App. 780, 788, 990 P.2d 986 (2000). The Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 1973 applies when a dispute involves a residential lease.