Sweet v. Roy, 801 A.2d 694 (2002)

Citation: Sweet v. Roy, 801 A.2d 694 (2002)
Parent Document: Sweet v. Roy, 801 A.2d 694 (2002)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2002-04-26
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2320480/sweet-v-roy/ ↗

Full Text

679 chars

The court found that defendants had violated the Vermont Mobile Home Park Act, 10 V.S.A- §§ 6201-6266 (the Act) in four respects. Specifically, it found illegal the policy of requiring tenants who wished to leave the park to remove the mobile home or sell it to defendants. It found illegal the rejection of prospective purchasers “for reasons that theretofore had not been prohibitions in the terms of the lease.” The court also found two violations.of the Vermont Consumer Fraud Act, 9 V.S.A §§ 2451-2480g. Specifically, it found that defendants violated the act in “the strong-arm tactics used in an apparent attempt to persuade Mr. Wright to abandon his tenancy in the park.”

Other Sections in This Document (207)

Full Text