Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hilder v. St. Peter, 478 A.2d 202 (1984)

Citation
Hilder v. St. Peter, 478 A.2d 202 (1984)
Parent Document
Hilder v. St. Peter, 478 A.2d 202 (1984)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
1984-02-03

Other Sections in This Document (84)

Full Text

559 chars
We find that defendants’ third claimed error, that the court erred in finding that both defendant Stuart St. Peter and defendant Patricia St. Peter were liable to plaintiff for the breach of the implied warranty of habitability, is meritless. Both defendants were named in the complaint as owners of the 10-12 Church Street apartment building. Plaintiff’s complaint also alleged that defendant Stuart St. Peter acted as agent for defendant Patricia St. Peter. Defendants failed to deny these allegations; under V.R.C.P. 8(d) these averments stand as admitted.