Gadsons v. Royal/Concord Gardens (1998)

Citation: Gadsons v. Royal/Concord Gardens (1998)
Parent Document: Gadsons v. Royal/Concord Gardens (1998)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 1998-05-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10695147/gadsons-v-royalconcord-gardens/ ↗

Full Text

631 chars

5
42 U.S.C. § 3604.   Claims under the FHA may take two forms:
disparate treatment and disparate impact. See Gamble v . City of
Escondido, 104 F.3d 3 0 0 , 304-05 (9th Cir. 1997); Mountain Side
Mobile Estates v . Secretary of HUD, 56 F.3d 1243, 1250 (10th Cir.
1995); Doe v . City of Butler, Pa., 892 F.2d 315, 323 (3rd Cir.
1989); Arthur v . City of Toledo, 782 F.2d 565, 574-75 (6th Cir.
1986).   Here, plaintiffs allege only the former, insofar as they
claim that they were evicted because of M r . Gadson’s race.2 In reviewing complaints of alleged FHA violations, numerous courts have recognized that direct proof of unlawful

Other Sections in This Document (122)

Full Text