§ 540

Citation: § 540
Parent Document: Flo-Pro v. 10 Iron Horse Drive, et al, 2011 DNH 155 (2011)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2011-09-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10694944/flo-pro-v-10-iron-horse-drive-et-al/ ↗

Full Text

740 chars

(S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 1998) (dismissing challenge to state court's
resolution of landlord-tenant dispute as barred by the Rooker-
Feldman doctrine), aff'd , 173 F.3d 845 (table), 1999 WL 146300
 (2d Cir. Mar. 15, 1999).  So these cases are inapposite here,
where, as just discussed, there is federal jurisdiction by way of
diversity.   The defendants do cite one case, Glen 6, and a few
cases following it without further discussion, actually ruling
that a federal court should abstain from hearing a possessory
action. But that decision was based almost entirely on the fact
that state law would provide the rules of decision--a rationale
which, whatever else can be said of it, does not support
abstention in this circuit, as just discussed.

Other Sections in This Document (490)

Full Text