Sykes v. RBS Citizens, 2014 DNH 045 (2014)

Citation: Sykes v. RBS Citizens, 2014 DNH 045 (2014)
Parent Document: Sykes v. RBS Citizens, 2014 DNH 045 (2014)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2014-03-04
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10696888/sykes-v-rbs-citizens/ ↗

Full Text

851 chars

5Sykes argues in his reply to the mortgage defendants'
objection that the objection, which was filed on January 31,
2014, should not be considered because it was filed more than
fourteen days after Sykes filed his motion for leave to file an
amended complaint on January 14, 2014. See LR 7.1(b). Sykes's
argument fails to factor in the additional three days allowed
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d) (providing for three
additional days after a period would otherwise expire when
service is effectuated, as here, by Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 5(b)(2)(E)). Even if the mortgage defendants'
objection were untimely, the court would consider the objection
in the interests of justice. See LR 1.3(b) ("The court may
excuse a failure to comply with any local rule whenever justice
so reguires."). 2
                        Standard of Review

Other Sections in This Document (622)

Full Text