DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Weeks v. Five Bros. Mtg., 2013 DNH 068 (2014)

Citation
Weeks v. Five Bros. Mtg., 2013 DNH 068 (2014)
Parent Document
Weeks v. Five Bros. Mtg., 2013 DNH 068 (2014)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2014-04-09
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10695256/weeks-v-five-bros-mtg/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (154)

Full Text

426 chars 
While staying at the Pittsfield Apartment, the plaintiffs
corresponded with U.S. Bank regarding resolution of the
additional charges and a possible modification agreement.
Eventually, U.S. Bank refused to enter into a modification
agreement with the plaintiffs, and instead increased the amount
due for the monthly mortgage payments in order to recoup the
money that the plaintiffs had not paid while making “half-
payments.”1