Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Citation
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Parent Document
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 1995-12-29
Other Sections in This Document (25)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
- Penrich, Inc. v. Sullivan, 140 N.H. 583 (1995)
Full Text
654 charsPenrich is the owner of Bear Brook Villa, a manufactured housing park (the park) located in Allenstown. The defendants are members of the board of directors of the Bear Brook Villa Tenants’ Association (tenants’ association). In January 1989, Penrich informed the tenants of the park that the monthly rental fee would be increased effective April 1, 1989. On March 22, 1989, the tenants’ association informed Penrich that certain tenants in the park would be withholding the rental increase because of alleged health and safety violations. These tenants began depositing the amount of the increase in an escrow account in the tenants’ association’s name.