Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Citation
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Parent Document
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-05-20
Other Sections in This Document (31)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
- Matte v. Shippee Auto, Inc., 152 N.H. 216 (2005)
Full Text
706 chars*223Finally, the defendant argues that “it was proper for the trial court to deny the eviction based on principles of equity.” We disagree. “[T]he district court is not a constitutional court and does not have a general grant of equitable power.” Emerson v. Town of Stratford, 139 N.H. 629, 631 (1995). It “is a court of limited jurisdiction with powers conferred by statute.” Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809, 816 (1991); see RSA 502-A:14 (1997). “Although it has the power to entertain possessory actions under RSA 540:13, the district court does not have equity jurisdiction.” Woodstock Soapstone, 133 N.H. at 816. Accordingly, we reject the defendant’s argument. Reversed and remanded.