Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Citation
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Parent Document
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 1971-04-05
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1895971/kline-v-burns/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (39)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
- Kline v. Burns, 111 N.H. 87 (1971)
Full Text
302 chars80 N.H. 564, 122 A. 329 (1923). The only duty the law imposes on a landlord for the benefit of his tenants, insofar as the leased premises are concerned, is a limited duty not to deceive the tenants as to the dangers incident to their use of which the landlord knows and they do not. Black v. Fiandaca,