East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- Citation
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- Parent Document
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1997-04-22
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
- East Providence Housing Authority v. Rogers, 97-0901 (1997) (1997)
Full Text
488 charsIt is well settled that the pendency of a prior action for the same cause and between the same parties within the same jurisdiction may be asserted as a ground for the abatement of the second action. Elmasian v. Daley, 87 R.I. 431, 142 A.2d 540 (1958). However, an action does not automatically abate for that reason and a litigant who has not raised the issue of that prior litigation during the trial is precluded from doing so on appeal.Rosen v. Rosen, 122 R.I. 6, 404 A.2d 472 (1979).