Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Citation
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Parent Document
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2006-04-24
Other Sections in This Document (17)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- Riley v. Stafford, 896 A.2d 701 (2006)
- § 767
- § 767
Full Text
533 charsThe plaintiff also argues that he is entitled to consequential damages because he was prevented from repairing and renting the third-floor apartment until defendant vacated the premises. Consequential damages are such damages “that do not flow directly and immediately from an injurious act but that result indirectly from the act.” Black’s Law Dictionary 416 (8th ed.2004). This Court has allowed consequential damages in cases involving tortious interference with one’s possessory interest in property. Hawkins v. Scituate Oil Co.,